Friday, February 03, 2006
Re: [evomech] Re: Peer Review and Genetic Determinism
From: "warrenbergerson" <warrenbergerson@msn.com>
Subject: [evomech] Re: Peer Review and Genetic Determinism
> Do you accept the published assertion that the concensus among
> geneticists is that genetic determinism is false?
Is there a biological question here? I don't care about
consensuses.
A minority view might be more interesting.
Cliff
Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/
Subject: [evomech] Re: Peer Review and Genetic Determinism
> Do you accept the published assertion that the concensus among
> geneticists is that genetic determinism is false?
Is there a biological question here? I don't care about
consensuses.
A minority view might be more interesting.
Cliff
Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/
Add to: CiteUlike | Connotea | Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl | Newsvine | Reddit | Yahoo
