Thursday, February 02, 2006


[evomech] Re: Peer Review and Genetic Determinism

Do you accept the published assertion that the concensus among
geneticists is that genetic determinism is false?

--- In, "Cliff Lundberg"
<cliff_lundberg@...> wrote:
> From: "warrenbergerson" <warrenbergerson@...>
> > For anyone interested in understanding the inherent unsoundness
> > of
> > peer reviewers, the peer review process, and the peer review
> > literature, it is interesting to go back and look at the really
> > awful logic and techniques used by peer reviewers and Internet
> > experts support the genetic determinism assumption and to
> > suppress
> > arguments and evidence contradicting the assumption.
> I'd rather spend the time learning about where or how genetic
> determinism is wrong. Is it just a matter of how far one goes with
> it in explaining evolution?
> We don't hear much about peer reviews. There must be
> very few interesting insights expressed in this medium.
> Cliff

Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:

Add to: CiteUlike | Connotea | | Digg | Furl | Newsvine | Reddit | Yahoo