Thursday, February 02, 2006
Re: [evomech] Peer Review and Genetic Determinism
From: "warrenbergerson" <warrenbergerson@msn.com>
> For anyone interested in understanding the inherent unsoundness
> of
> peer reviewers, the peer review process, and the peer review
> literature, it is interesting to go back and look at the really
> awful logic and techniques used by peer reviewers and Internet
> experts support the genetic determinism assumption and to
> suppress
> arguments and evidence contradicting the assumption.
I'd rather spend the time learning about where or how genetic
determinism is wrong. Is it just a matter of how far one goes with
it in explaining evolution?
We don't hear much about peer reviews. There must be
very few interesting insights expressed in this medium.
Cliff
Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/
> For anyone interested in understanding the inherent unsoundness
> of
> peer reviewers, the peer review process, and the peer review
> literature, it is interesting to go back and look at the really
> awful logic and techniques used by peer reviewers and Internet
> experts support the genetic determinism assumption and to
> suppress
> arguments and evidence contradicting the assumption.
I'd rather spend the time learning about where or how genetic
determinism is wrong. Is it just a matter of how far one goes with
it in explaining evolution?
We don't hear much about peer reviews. There must be
very few interesting insights expressed in this medium.
Cliff
Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/
Add to: CiteUlike | Connotea | Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl | Newsvine | Reddit | Yahoo
