Friday, March 03, 2006

 

[evomech] Re: Antisymmetry (Chapter 16 of 'Variation')

--- In evomech@yahoogroups.com, "John Latter" <jorolat@...> wrote:
>
> [A. Richard Palmer. "Antisymmetry." In Variation, Editors B Hallgrimmson and BK Hall. Elsevier (2005): 359-397]
>
> Introduction:
>
> The notion of antisymmetry likely strikes most people as bizarre. How can any
> variation exist that is "anti-" something else? To dismiss antisymmetry as mere
> intellectual catnip of academic snoots would seem easy. To dismiss it too hastily
> would be a big mistake.
>
> Antisymmetry is a peculiar kind of variation whose evolutionary significance is
> surprisingly unappreciated, no doubt in part because the term seems odd and foreboding. However, the phenomenon, with its particularly apt moniker, is actually
> widespread and offers the promise of valuable insights into a century-old debate
> about the interplay between development and evolution.

Now available at:

http://www.bms.bc.ca/library/Palmer'05%20CH16-Antisym-proofs-ed-4.pdf

John Latter

Model of an Internal Evolutionary Mechanism

http://members.aol.com/jorolat/index.html

technorati tags: , , ,

Please Note: If you are reading this in a Blog then replying directly to this message (as opposed to making a 'blog comment') requires membership of the 'Evolution: Where Darwin meets Lamarck?' Egroup at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evomech/


Add to: CiteUlike | Connotea | Del.icio.us | Digg | Furl | Newsvine | Reddit | Yahoo


Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< 'Evomech Posts' Home